More from the recent ADHD article in Psychiatric Times
(Jummani, MD, et al, in Psychiatric Times, May 2017, pp 26-28.)
To diagnose ADHD formally in children requires at least 6 of 9 inattentive symptoms and /or at least 6 of 9 symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity, present in two or more environments, evident before age 12, not accounted for by other conditions, and “…clear evidence that the symptoms interfere with, or reduce the quality of, social, academic, or occupational functioning.”
Thus, there are tight rules for making the diagnosis and not just saying someone is a problem in the classroom. The “let the children be children” advocates don’t know what they’re talking about. Johnny is failing his classes, spending a lot of time in the principal’s office, shunned or teased or bullied by the other kids, losing his homework if he did it at all and at times his whole backpack, and is a source of extreme frustration to his parents. Annie is daydreaming through class, barely passing, and largely ignored because she doesn’t cause any trouble.
To make the diagnosis in adults, the criteria are the same, but only five symptoms are required.
Most adult ADHDers have less dramatic hyperactivity and impulsivity. But life is still hard. We need strategies. And often medication.
In addition, before diagnosing, a good evaluation would include historical data, a rating scale, DSM criteria and additional information from at the least one other person who knows the patient well. This often does not happen.
Most diagnoses are made by primary care physicians who do not have the training, and more importantly, do not have the time, for this. They are more likely than psychiatrists to quickly start patients on medication without first starting psychosocial interventions.
I agree with the need for a good evaluation, but sometimes just getting the story and observing the patient in an interview are enough to make the diagnosis pretty clear. I did also use a rating scale, usually more to help convince the patient more than myself, and got outside information when possible. The recommendations can be impracticable, given the limited time most physicians have and the lack of enough psychiatrists to meet the need. One recommendation was that the physician go to observe the child in the classroom. Oh, my.
Many psychologists are better trained to make the diagnosis than many physicians, even many psychiatrists, but may lean too far away from recommending medication since most can’t prescribe. Many well trained ADHD coaches could make the diagnosis, although they are not supposed to.
I think most people with ADHD deserve at least a trial of medication to see how it works for them.
The rate of children being diagnosed with ADHD, and often treated with medication, is rising. There are many possible explanations for this, which I will try to address next time. Maybe. This post is already longer than I’d intended.
doug
News O the Day of Interest to No One But Me:
My iPhone arrived Monday morning. I really missed it.
Links:
DSM V diagnostic criteria for ADHD, David Rabiner, Ph.D.
- ADHD is not —
- Who needs an eulogy? Won’t it will be a little too late?
- There are two kinds of people, those with ADHD and when I eat ice cream sometimes I get a headache.
- Denial
- “I don’t believe in ADHD.”
- My ADHD medication supplement.
…had some technical difficulties.
I was saying, thanks for the post, and I had two quick things.
One, do you ever listen to Attention Talk Radio? I heard a podcast today in which the gentleman was saying that nicotine can benefit people with ADHD and that back before we cut out smoking everywhere, perhaps people were self-medicating. And now, my inference, is that since people are cutting back so drastically on their nicotine intake, ADHD symptoms may be more prevelant and people may be more diagnosed. Have you heard about this?
Also, I had a quick question. You mentioned that ADHD coaches shouldn’t be making the diagnoses, but I thought only certain medical practitioners could. Are you saying that that they can’t, but understand the child well enough that they could make a diagnosis?
Thanks again for the blog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
becket
thanks for your good comments.
no, i dont listen to radio but sounds like a good program. havent heard about the nicotine, tho it certainly helps people with schizoprenia. do you know if there have been any ADHD studies using the gum or the patches? no one should smoke, damage far outweighs any possible benefits.
not sure what i said, but you are right about what i meant – ADHD coaches tell me they are not allowed to make a diagnosis, but I’m pretty sure they are capable of doing so. they might miss some other comorbid conditions or even some conditions that masquerade as ADHD, but so do MD’s
thank you for commenting
doug
links
http://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/news/19991202/nicotine-patch-help-concentration#1
VOL 32, NO. 1, 1996
67
Nicotine and Attention in Aduit
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD
)1
C. Keith Conners, Ph.D., Edward D. Levin,
Ph.D., Elizabeth Sparrow, B.S., Sean C.
Hinton, M.S., Drew Erhardt, Ph.D., Warren
H. Meek, Ph.D., Jed E. Rose, Ph.D. and
John March, M.D.2
Abstract
Nicotine, like the psychostimulants methylphenidate
and dextroamphetamine, acts as an indirect dopamine
agonist and improves attention and arousal. Adults
and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) smoke much more frequently than
normal individuals or those with other psychiatric con
ditions, perhaps as a form of self-medication for ADHD
symptoms. Nicotine might therefore have some value
as a treatment for ADHD. The present study is an acute
double-blind crossover administration of nicotine and
placebo with smokers (n=6) and nonsmokers
[n=
11)
diagnosed with adult ADHD. The drug was delivered
via a transdermal patch at a dosage of 7 mg/day for
nonsmokers and 21 mg/day for smokers. Results indi
cate significant clinician-rated global improvement,
self-rated vigor and concentration, and improved per
formance on chronometric measures of attention and
timing accuracy. Side effects were minimal. These
acute results indicate the need for a longer clinical trial
and a comparison with other stimulants in adult ADHD
treatment.
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
32(1 ):67-73,1996.
Keywords:
nicotine, ADHD, adult ADD, pharmacotherapy.
LikeLike
beckett
sorry i missed the earlier t.
the nicotine sounds promising. would like some more recent data. but no smoking!
thanks
doug
LikeLike
I don’t know about any studies. The host was interviewing a researcher and I think they were sort of pontificating about future research.
I look forward to reading more of your work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
beckett
and i look forward to reading more of your comments. you turned me onto the nicotine question, i will need to research it further. and probably the topic of another post
thanks
doug
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, thanks for the post!
Two
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Life With ADHD — ADHD Tip O the Day 787 | ADDadultstrategies
Diagnosing kids can be tricky, I see. I’m pretty sure my niece has adhd, but since even my sister doesn’t know I have ADHD (and our mother too, I’m pretty sure), I’m here the school will figure it out when she starts going. It is a delicate topic, and as you usually put it: it’s a booger.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ram – well, there is a genetic component, especially fathers to sons. in the US, I wouldn’t be too hopeful that the school would figure it out. Sad.
thank you for commenting. you add a lot.
doug
LikeLike